Research Article | DOI: https://doi.org/SH-IMSA-RA-013

Clinical Evaluation and Success Rate of Dental Implants in Posterior Edentulous Patients: A Retrospective Study

  • John M. Carter 1*

  • Priya S. Mehra 2

  • Luis Fernando Rojas 3

1.Department of Prosthodontics, Global Dental Institute, New York, USA.

2.Department of Periodontology, Institute of Dental Sciences, Delhi, India.

3.Division of Oral Implantology, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City, Mexico.

*Corresponding Author: John M. Carter, Department of Prosthodontics, Global Dental Institute, New York, USA.

Citation: John M. Carter, Praia S. Mehran, Luis Fernando Rojas (2024), Clinical Evaluation and Success Rate of Dental Implants in Posterior Edentulous Patients: A Retrospective Study; J. Implants in Medicine and Surgical Approaches, 1(3): DOI:SH-IMSA-RA-013.

Copyright : © 2025 John M. Carter. This open-access article is distributed under the terms of The Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Received: 29 November 2024 | Accepted: 15 December 2024 | Published: 30 December 2024

Keywords: dental implants, posterior edentulism, implant success rate, peri-implantitis, oral rehabilitation, titanium implants, implant stability

Abstract

Objective: The study aims to evaluate the clinical outcomes and success rate of endosseous dental implants placed in posterior edentulous sites over a period of three years.

Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted on 120 patients who received 180 titanium dental implants in posterior mandibular and maxillary regions. Clinical parameters such as implant stability, peri-implant bone loss, soft tissue health, and prosthetic success were assessed during follow-up visits at 6, 12, 24, and 36 months.

Results: The cumulative success rate of dental implants was 94.4% at the end of three years. The most common cause of failure was peri-implantitis, particularly in patients with a history of periodontitis and poor oral hygiene. No statistically significant difference was found between maxillary and mandibular implant success rates.

Conclusion: Dental implants in posterior edentulous regions show high success rates and are a predictable option for oral rehabilitation, provided appropriate case selection and maintenance protocols are followed.

INTRODUCTION

 

Dental implants have emerged as a standard treatment modality for the replacement of missing teeth, offering improved function, esthetics, and patient satisfaction. The introduction of osseointegrated titanium implants by Brånemark in the 1960s revolutionized prosthetic dentistry.

Implant therapy in posterior edentulous regions presents unique challenges due to bone quality variability, occlusal load, and accessibility. Despite these challenges, success rates for dental implants in posterior sites have improved due to advancements in surgical protocols, surface treatments, and prosthetic designs.

This study aims to assess the long-term clinical outcomes and factors influencing the success or failure of dental implants placed in posterior regions over a 36-month period.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

 

Study Design
A retrospective study was conducted based on clinical records from January 2019 to December 2022 at two private dental centers.

Inclusion Criteria

  • Patients aged 20–70 years
  • Implants placed in the posterior maxilla or mandible
  • Follow-up data available for a minimum of 36 months

Exclusion Criteria

  • Systemic conditions affecting bone metabolism
  • History of radiation therapy in the head and neck region
  • Non-compliance with follow-up

Surgical Procedure
Standard two-stage surgical protocol was followed. Implants used were screw-type titanium with roughened surfaces. Healing abutments were placed after 3–4 months of osseointegration.

Clinical Assessment Parameters

  • Primary and secondary implant stability (manual torque and percussion test)
  • Marginal bone loss (measured via radiographs)
  • Presence of peri-implant mucositis or peri-implantitis
  • Prosthetic complications (screw loosening, fracture, prosthesis failure)

Statistical Analysis
Descriptive statistics and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis were used to evaluate implant survival. Chi-square test was used to compare categorical variables.

RESULTS

 

Out of 180 implants placed in 120 patients (68 males, 52 females), 170 implants remained functional and asymptomatic at the end of 36 months, indicating a cumulative success rate of 94.4%.

  • Implant Failure (n=10):
    • Peri-implantitis: 6 cases
    • Early failure due to lack of osseointegration: 3 cases
    • Prosthetic overload: 1 case
  • Mean Marginal Bone Loss:
    • 0.9 mm at 12 months
    • 1.3 mm at 36 months
  • No significant difference in implant survival between the maxillary (93.8%) and mandibular (95.1%) groups.

DISCUSSION

 

The high success rate observed aligns with existing literature on implant performance in posterior regions. Although posterior implants are exposed to higher masticatory loads, modern implant designs and careful surgical protocols have minimized the risk of failure.

Peri-implantitis remains the primary cause of late implant failure, often linked to poor plaque control and smoking. The slightly higher failure rate in maxillary implants, although not statistically significant, may be due to lower bone density.

Prosthetic complications were minimal and manageable, reinforcing the importance of occlusal harmony and patient education on oral hygiene practices.

CONCLUSION

 

Dental implants in posterior edentulous regions offer a reliable and durable solution for tooth replacement, with success rates exceeding 94% over three years. Long-term implant survival is contingent upon rigorous case selection, meticulous surgical technique, and effective post-operative care.

Future studies should explore prospective multicenter trials and evaluate implant performance in medically compromised populations.

References

img

"ScienceHood Publishing exceeded our expectations with their seamless execution and professionalism. Their team ensured timely communication, high-quality production, and attention to detail throughout the process. They transformed our vision into reality, delivering exceptional results. We highly recommend them for their efficiency, expertise, and commitment to excellence in publishing."

Lara Simmons

img

"ScienceHood Publishing surpassed our expectations with their professionalism, timely communication, and exceptional attention to detail. They transformed our vision into reality with outstanding results. We highly recommend them for their expertise and commitment to excellence."

Shippora Smith

img

"Publishing in this journal gave me the opportunity to involve Bioinformatics, which is a cutting-edge field with so much potential, into my previous research on Optogenetics and Artificial Intelligence. This experience helped me better understand how closely interconnected STEM fields truly are, and how many opportunities exist for interdisciplinary collaboration to allow them to work together and, once again, change the world, as science has always done"

Tomas Hadi Acosta Aguilera

img

"Dear editors, It has also been a real pleasure working with you on the publication of our article. Your patience, understanding, and prompt responses whenever we needed them have been a great help to us in this joint endeavour."

Madeleine TOURE