1. Additional Professor, Department of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, INDIA.
2. Junior Resident, Department of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, INDIA.
3. Professor, Department of General Medicine, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, INDIA.
4. Additional Professor, Department of Pathology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, INDIA.
5. Additional Professor, Department of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, INDIA.
*Corresponding Author:
Pankaj Sharma, Additional Professor, Department of Radiodiagnosis, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Rishikesh, Uttarakhand, INDIA.
Citation:
Pankaj Sharma, Bhavya Sharma, Ravi Kant, Ashok Singh, and Udit Chauhan (2025), Evaluating Thyroid Nodules: Combined ACR TIRADS and Colour Doppler for Improved Diagnosis; J. Clinical Cancer and Oncology, 2(1): DOI: SH-CCO-RA- 0007.
Our study is first prospective study from Himalayan belt of North India, wherein we have tried to evaluate palpable or clinically suspicious thyroid nodules using combined ACR TIRADS and Colour Doppler, along with cyto-pathological correlation.
Material and Method:
120 patients underwent HR-USG evaluation of palpable or clinically suspicious thyroid nodule, using ACR TIRADS scoring system, over a period of 18 months. The final ACR TIRADS score was prospectively correlated with cyto-pathological diagnosis.
Result and Observation:
ACR TIRADS had sensitivity of 92.0%, specificity of 77.9%, positive predictive value of 52.3%, negative predictive value of 97.4%, and diagnostic accuracy of 80.8%, for differentiating benign from malignant thyroid nodule. Increased central vascularity on colour doppler had sensitivity of 80.8%, specificity of 83.2%, positive predictive value of 55.6%, negative predictive value of 94.0%, and diagnostic accuracy of 82.5%, for differentiating benign from malignant thyroid nodule.
Conclusion:
High resolution sonography plays an important role in the stratification of at risk nodules requiring further evaluation, and ACR TIRADS should be routinely used in reporting of thyroid nodules. Colour doppler can play a role in adjunction with gray scale ultrasonography in diagnosis of malignant thyroid nodules, specially when using ACR TIRADS for patient categorization and management. Moreover, ultrasonography can help in reducing unnecessary FNAC of benign thyroid nodules.
INTRODUCTION
Our study is first prospective study from Himalayan belt of North India, wherein we have tried to evaluate palpable or clinically suspicious thyroid nodules using combined ACR TIRADS and Colour Doppler, along with cyto-pathological correlation
MATERIAL AND METHOD
120 patients with age more than 18 years, were referred to Department of Radiodiagnosis for HR-USG evaluation of palpable or clinically suspicious thyroid nodule. These patients were recruited over a period of 18 months, and all of them gave written informed consent.
Exclusion criteria were as follows:
Patient with ongoing treatment for thyroid malignancy,
Patient with past history of treatment for thyroid malignancy,
Patient with indeterminate & inconclusive results on FNAC,
Patient who didn’t gave written informed consent.
Technique:
All thyroid nodules were evaluated on Gray scale and Colour Doppler, using high frequency linear USG probe (7–12 MHz). The characteristics of each nodule was used to assign ACR TIRADS score. The final ACR TIRADS score was prospectively correlated with cytological diagnosis. Color Doppler examination was performed by using standard equipment settings for thyroid gland. Doppler amplification was set to a level that normal thyroid tissue didn’t display any noise, and was just under the level for appearance of random noise.
Thyroid nodule Colour Doppler vascularity was categorized into four categories:
Increased central vascularity,
Increased peripheral vascularity,
Increased central and peripheral vascularity,
Absent increased central/peripheral vascularity.
FNAC was done from palpable or clinically suspicious thyroid nodule (Figure 1), and assessed using The Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology (TBSRTC), after fulfilling the adequacy criteria.1 Final diagnosis in all cases diagnosed as Follicular neoplasm on FNAC, was based on histopathological diagnosis after surgical resection.
Figure 1 : FNA cytology of thyroid nodule with echogenic needle in long axis
STATISTICAL ANALYSIS
Microsoft Excel spread sheet was used to enter all the data. All precautions were taken to make sure that there was no error in data entry. The data was analysed using SPSS statistical software. There was a statistically significant difference if the p-value was less than 0.05
OBSERVATION AND RESULT
120 patients were included in study population. 28(23.33%) patients were in age group of 21– 30 years; 27(22.50%) patients were in age group of 31– 40 years; 24(20.00%) patients were in age group of 41– 50 years; 19(15.83%) patients were in age group of 51– 60 years; 16(13.33%) patients were in age group of 61– 70 years; 4(3.30%) patients were in age group less than 20 years; and 2 (1.66%) patients were in age group of 71–80 years (Table 1). 19(15.8%) patients were male; and 101(84.2%) patients were female.
Age
Frequency
Percentage
≤20 Years
4
3.30%
21-30 Years
28
23.33%
31-40 Years
27
22.50%
41-50 Years
24
20.00%
51-60 Years
19
15.83%
61-70 Years
16
13.33%
71-80 Years
2
1.66%
Total
120
100.0%
Table 1 : Distributaion of patients in terms of age (n=120)
Thyroid nodules varied in size from 4 mm to 87 mm, with mean nodule size being 24.98 + 14.89 (Standard deviation) mm. 74(16.70%) thyroid nodules measured less than/equal to 25 mm; and 46(38.30%) thyroid nodules measured more than 25 mm in longest dimension. 71(59.20%) nodules involved right lobe of thyroid; 47(39.20%) nodules involved left lobe of thyroid; and 2(1.70%) nodules involved thyroid isthmus (Table 2).
Lobe Involved
Frequency
Percentage
Right
71
59.2%
Left
47
39.2%
Isthmus
2
1.7%
Total
120
100.0%
Table 2 : Distribution of patients in terms of involvement of thyroid lobe (n=120)
According to vascularity on Colour Doppler (Figure 2,3,4,5 and Table 3); 73(60.80%) patients showed absent increased central/peripheral vascularity; 24(20.00%) patients showed increased central vascularity; 12(10.00%) patients showed increased central as well as peripheral vascularity; and 11(9.20%) patients showed increased peripheral vascularity.
Increased central as well as peripheral vascularity
12
10.0%
Total
120
100.0%
Table 3 : Distributaion of patients according to vascularity on Colour Doppler (n = 120)
According to ACR TIRADS scoring system (Table 4); 40(33.30%) patients had T3 score; 36(30.00%) patients had T2 score; 28(23.30%) patients had T4 score; and 16(13.30%) patients had T5 score.
TIRADS
Frequency
Percentage
TR2
36
30.0%
TR3
40
33.3%
TR4
28
23.3%
TR5
16
13.3%
Total
120
100.0%
Table 4: Distributaion of patients according to ACR TIRADS scoring system (n = 120)
According to cytological diagnosis after fine needle aspiration cytology (Table 5); 47 (39.2%) patients had colloid goitre; 24 (20%) patients had adenomatous goitre; 18 (15%) patients had papillary carcinoma; 8 (6.7%) patients had lymphocytic thyroiditis; 6 (5.0%) patients had reactive lymphoid hyperplasia; 5 (4.2%) patients had reactive follicular carcinoma; 3 (2.5%) patients had autoimmune thyroiditis; 3 (2.5%) patients had granulomatous inflammation; 2 (1.7%) patients had hurthle cell nodule; and 2 (1.7%) patients had medullary carcinoma. According to cytological diagnosis after fine needle aspiration cytology (Table 6); 95 (79.2%) patients had benign thyroid disease; and 25 (20.8%) patients had malignant thyroid disease.
Cyto-pathological diagnosis
Frequency
Percentage
Colloid Goitre
47
39.2%
Adenomatous Goitre
24
20.0%
Papillary Carcinoma
18
15.0%
Lymphocytic Thyroiditis
8
6.7%
Reactive Lymphoid Hyperplasia
6
5.0%
Follicular Carcinoma
5
4.2%
Autoimmune Thyroiditis
3
2.5%
Granulomatous Inflammation
3
2.5%
Hurthle Cell Nodule
2
1.7%
Medullary Carcinoma
2
1.7%
Total
120
100.0%
Table 5: Distributaion of patients after cytopathological diagnosis (n = 120)
Cytological diagnosis
Frequency
Percentage
Benign
95
79.17%
Malignant
25
20.83%
Total
120
100.0%
Table 6: Distributaion of patients in terms of cytological diagnosis after fine needle aspiration cytology (n = 120)
Table 7 shows comparison of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of various parameters. TIRADS had sensitivity of 92.0%, specificity of 77.9%, positive predictive value of 52.3%, negative predictive value of 97.4%, and diagnostic accuracy of 80.8%, for differentiating benign from malignant thyroid nodule. Increased central vascularity on colour doppler had sensitivity of 80.8%, specificity of 83.2%, positive predictive value of 55.6%, negative predictive value of 94.0%, and diagnostic accuracy of 82.5%, for differentiating benign from malignant thyroid nodule.
Variable
Sensitivity
Specificity
PPV
NPV
Diagnostic
Accuracy
Size (mm) (Cut off: 27 by ROC)
52.0%
(31-72)
66.3%
(56-76)
28.9%
(16-44)
84.0%
(74-91)
63.3%
(54-72)
Size
52.0%
(31-72)
65.3%
(55-75)
28.3%
(16-43)
83.8%
(73-91)
62.5%
(53-71)
Increased central vascularity on Color Doppler
80.0%
(59-93)
83.2%
(74-90)
55.6%
(38-72)
94.0%
(87-98)
82.5%
(75-89)
TIRADS
92.0%
(74-99)
77.9%
(68-86)
52.3%
(37-68)
97.4%
(91-100)
80.8%
(73-87)
Table 7: Comparison of sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and diagnostic accuracy of various parameters
Raw data (e.g., imaging datasets, FNAC results, statistical analysis files) are available with authors, and authors can be contacted in this regard.
DISCUSSION
120 patients were included in our study for evaluation of thyroid nodule : clinically symptomatic patient with no palpable thyroid nodule; or clinically symptomatic patient with palpable thyroid nodule; or clinically suspected patient with no specific symptom. Thyroid nodules were observed to be more common in female population, suggestive of female predominance, comprising 84.2% of total study population.
In present study, highest number of cases were reported in 21-30 years age group (23.33%), followed by 31-40 years age group (22.50%). Malignant thyroid nodules were commonly of size more than 1 cm, and solitary (66.6%) in nature.
Our study has shown malignancy risk as 2.8%, 2.5%, 35.7% and 81.2% for TR2, TR3, TR4 and TR5 thyroid nodules respectively. Our results are in concordance with previous studies, with 92% sensitivity, 77% specificity, 52.3% positive predictive value, and 97.4% negative predictive value, when we did correlation of TIRADS scoring system with histopathology. Table 8 shows review of literature, with inference that ACR TIRADS is useful scoring system for evaluation of thyroid nodules, in comparison to other TIRADS scoring system.
Torshizian A, et al.
Retrospective.
571 thyroid nodules.
2023.
The AUC, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 0.691, 49.2%, 84.9%, 29.6%, and 92.8% for ATA guideline, and 0.776, 72.3%, 79.2%, 30.9%, and 95.7%, for ACR TI-RADS, respectively. ACR TI-RADS was more sensitive (p = 0.003), while the ATA guideline was more specific (p < 0>
Jin Z, et al.
Retrospective.
3438 thyroid nodules.
2023.
C-TIRADS showed higher discrimination performance (AUROC, 0.857; AUPRC, 0.605) than ACR-TIRADS (AUROC, 0.844; AUPRC, 0.567) and EU-TIRADS (AUROC, 0.802; AUPRC, 0.455). C-TIRADS may be a clinically applicable tool to manage thyroid nodules, which warrants thorough tests in other geographic settings.
Cai Y, et al.
Retrospective.
1228 thyroid nodules.
2023.
The 2017 ACR-TIRADS had the highest diagnostic performance [area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) 0.938], followed by the 2020 C-TIRADS (AUROC 0.933) and the 2015 ATA guidelines (AUROC 0.928).
Huang Hu, et al.
Retrospective.
512 thyroid nodules.
2023.
ACR TI-RADS and C-TIRADS systems had relatively high diagnostic efficacy for elderly thyroid cancer. The diagnostic efficacy between the two systems was not statistically significant. In addition, the two systems had high clinical practical values, while there is still a significant risk of missed diagnosis.
Borges AP, et al.
Retrospective.
665 thyroid nodules.
2023.
The EU-TIRADS and ACR TI-RADS are both suitable to assess thyroid nodules and through risk stratification avoid unnecessary FNA. FNA was less performed using ACR TI-RADS, which was slightly more efficiency in excluding malignancy.
Chen Q, et al.
Retrospective.
1982 thyroid nodules.
2022.
C-TIRADS has excellent performance in the malignancy risk stratification of thyroid nodules by the optimized cut-off value, which is comparable to that in K-TIRADS and ACR-TIRADS.
Chen H, et al.
Retrospective.
2000 thyroid nodules.
2021.
The ACR TIRADS classification system is less invasive and can identify suspicious nodules more accurately than that of ATA and AACE/ACE/AME.
Li Wei, et al.
Systemic Review and Meta-analysis.
2021.
ACR TI-RADS showed favorable sensitivity and moderate specificity in risk stratification of thyroid nodules. The use of ACR TI-RADS could avoid a large number of unnecessary biopsies, although at the cost of a slight decline in sensitivity.
Gao L, et al.
Retrospective.
2544 thyroid nodules.
2019.
KWAK-TIRADS and ATA guidelines provide a better diagnostic efficiency than ACR TI-RADS. The TIRADS (KWAK-TIRADS and ACR TI-RADS) category and ATA guidelines perform better in differentiating nodules >1 cm than nodules ≤1 cm. KWAK-TIRADS perform better in differentiating nodules >1 cm than other methods.
Our study
High resolution sonography plays an important role in the stratification of at risk nodules requiring further evaluation, and ACR TIRADS should be routinely used in reporting of thyroid nodules. Colour doppler can play a role in adjunction with gray scale ultrasonography in diagnosis of malignant thyroid nodules, specially when using ACR TIRADS for patient categorization and management. Moreover, ultrasonography can help in reducing unnecessary FNAC of benign thyroid nodules.
Table 8: Review of Literature2-10
In our series, 73 out of 120 thyroid nodules showed absent increased central/peripheral vascularity; 95.9% of which were found to be benign in nature. 12 out of 120 thyroid nodules showed increased central as well as peripheral blood vascularity; 58% of which were found to be benign in nature, and 41.7% of which were found to be malignant in nature. 20 out of 25 malignant thyroid nodule showed increased central blood vascularity. That means, in our study, 95% of benign thyroid nodules showed absent increased central/peripheral vascularity; while 80% of malignant thyroid nodules showed increased central vascularity.
Increased vascularity on colour doppler had sensitivity of 80.8%, specificity of 83.2%, positive predictive value of 55.6%, negative predictive value of 94.0%, and diagnostic accuracy of 82.5%, for differentiating benign from malignant thyroid nodule. P value was significant for differentiating benign from malignant thyroid nodule, for both increased central vascularity on colour Doppler, and TIRADS scoring system; when we did correlation with cytological diagnosis after FNAC.
According to cytological diagnosis after FNAC; 79.2% patients had benign thyroid disease, and 20.8% patients had malignant thyroid disease. Only exception was FNAC diagnosis of Follicular carcinoma, which was confirmed on histopathology after surgical resection. Our study highlights that TIRADS scoring system, alongwith Colour doppler findings, can be used for evaluation of thyroid nodules; with avoidance of invasive FNAC, especially in patients with absent increased central/peripheral vascularity, and TR2.
In our study, best predictor of malignancy in combination with ACR TIRADS categorization was : Increased central vascularity. We evaluated palpable or suspicious thyroid nodules using ACR TIRADS and Colour Doppler, but not using SMI quantification. Indeterminate nodules with no increased central vascularity on colour Doppler can be spared FNAC, if same results are found on multicentric studies, with inclusion of population from different geographical areas.
CONCLUSION
High resolution sonography plays an important role in the stratification of at risk nodules requiring further evaluation, and ACR TIRADS should be routinely used in reporting of thyroid nodules. Colour doppler can play a role in adjunction with gray scale ultrasonography in diagnosis of malignant thyroid nodules, specially when using ACR TIRADS for patient categorization and management. Moreover, ultrasonography can help in reducing unnecessary FNAC of benign thyroid nodules.
LIMITATIONS AND FUTURE DIRECTIONS
Main limitation of our study is that it is single center-based study, conducted in Himalayan belt of North India. Even though there are specific characters of benignity and malignancy on ultrasound, it may overlap in some cases which may lead to misdiagnosis. In such cases, histopathological diagnosis becomes of utmost importance. There may also be presence of inter-observer variation on ultrasound evaluation in our study. To reach meaningful conclusion, multi-centre trial should be done with inclusion of large cohort of patients, alongwith Artificial Intelligence based machine learning integration for thyroid nodule assessment, using both Colour Doppler and SMI Quantification.
References
Syed ZA, Zubair WB, Cochand-Priollet B, Schmitt FC, et al. The 2023 Bethesda System for Reporting Thyroid Cytopathology. Thyroid. 2023;33(9):1039-44. View
at PublisherView
at Google Scholar
Borges AP, Antunes C, Caseiro-Alves F, Donato P, et al. Analysis of 665 thyroid nodules using both EU-TIRADS and ACR TI-RADS classification systems. Thyroid Res. 2023;16:12. View
at PublisherView
at Google Scholar
Torshizian A, Hashemi F, Khoshhal N, Ghodsi A, et al. Diagnostic Performance of ACR TI-RADS and ATA Guidelines in the Prediction of Thyroid Malignancy: A Prospective Single Tertiary Center Study and Literature Review. Diagnostics. 2023;13(18):2972. View
at PublisherView
at Google Scholar
Jin Z, Pei S, Shen H, Ouyang L, et al. Comparative Study of C-TIRADS, ACR-TIRADS, and EU-TIRADS for Diagnosis and Management of Thyroid Nodules. Acad Radiol. 2023;30(10):2181-91. View
at PublisherView
at Google Scholar
Cai Y, Yang R, Yang S, Lu L, et al. Comparison of the C-TIRADS, ACR-TIRADS, and ATA guidelines in malignancy risk stratification of thyroid nodules. Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2023;13(7):4514-25. View
at PublisherView
at Google Scholar
Huang Hu, Zhu Ming-Jie, Gao Qi, Huang Yan-Li, et al. Comparison of Diagnostic Values of ACR TI-RADS versus C-TIRADS Scoring and Classification Systems for the Elderly Thyroid Cancers. Int J Gen Med. 2023:16 4441–51. View
at PublisherView
at Google Scholar
Chen Q, Lin M, Wu S. Validating and Comparing C-TIRADS, K-TIRADS and ACR-TIRADS in Stratifying the Malignancy Risk of Thyroid Nodules. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2022 (Jun 17);13:899575. View
at PublisherView
at Google Scholar
Li Wei, Wang Y, Wen J, Zhang L, et al. Diagnostic Performance of American College of Radiology TI-RADS: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Am J Roent. 2021;216(1):38-47. View
at PublisherView
at Google Scholar
9. Gao L, Xi X, Jiang Y, Yang X, et al. Comparison among TIRADS (ACR TI-RADS and KWAK- TI-RADS) and 2015 ATA Guidelines in the diagnostic efficiency of thyroid nodules. Endocrine. 2019;64:90-6. View
at PublisherView
at Google Scholar
10. Chen H, Ye J, Song J, You Y, et al. Comparison of Different Ultrasound Classification Systems of Thyroid Nodules for Identifying Malignant Potential: A Cross-sectional Study. Clinics (Sao Paulo). 2021 (Jan 20);76:e2126. View
at PublisherView
at Google Scholar
"ScienceHood Publishing surpassed our expectations with their professionalism, timely communication, and exceptional attention to detail. They transformed our vision into reality with outstanding results. We highly recommend them for their expertise and commitment to excellence."
Shippora Smith
"ScienceHood Publishing exceeded our expectations with their seamless execution and professionalism. Their team ensured timely communication, high-quality production, and attention to detail throughout the process. They transformed our vision into reality, delivering exceptional results. We highly recommend them for their efficiency, expertise, and commitment to excellence in publishing."
Lara Simmons
""I had an exceptional experience publishing my research article with ScienceHood LLC. From the very first interaction, the team displayed utmost professionalism and provided prompt support throughout the entire process. The editorial team was thorough, offering constructive feedback that enhanced the quality of my work. Their attention to detail, timely communication, and dedication to scientific excellence truly set them apart. I am thrilled with the final publication, and I highly recommend ScienceHood LLC to fellow researchers seeking a reliable and proficient publishing platform.""
Paul Atkinson
"ScienceHood Publishing surpassed our expectations with their professionalism, timely communication, and exceptional attention to detail. They transformed our vision into reality with outstanding results. We highly recommend them for their expertise and commitment to excellence."
Shippora Smith
"ScienceHood Publishing exceeded our expectations with their seamless execution and professionalism. Their team ensured timely communication, high-quality production, and attention to detail throughout the process. They transformed our vision into reality, delivering exceptional results. We highly recommend them for their efficiency, expertise, and commitment to excellence in publishing."